INFR vs QQQ
Clearbridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INFR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $12M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +0.31% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.37% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.21% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.39% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2016 | Mar 10, 1999 |
INFR vs QQQ Performance
Clearbridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year INFR returned +26.37% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, INFR is up 0.31% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, INFR compounded at +5.21% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +0.39% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.4% for INFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.8% for INFR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INFR charges 0.59% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $18 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INFR currently yields 2.52% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
INFR and QQQ share 3 holdings out of 129 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INFR or QQQ?
INFR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INFR or QQQ?
Over the past year INFR returned +26.37% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), INFR annualized +3.53% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INFR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.4% for INFR. Worst drawdown: INFR -35.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both INFR and QQQ?
INFR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INFR and QQQ?
INFR and QQQ share 3 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 129 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INFR or QQQ?
INFR yields 2.52% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so INFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.