INFR vs VTI
Clearbridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, INFR or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. INFR led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INFR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,524 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 9.1 years | $13,712 | $31,860Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2016 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 256 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. INFR has data through Jan 22, 2026 and VTI through Oct 5, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 9.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 30, 2016 to Jan 22, 2026 (9.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.8% for INFR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INFR charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INFR currently yields 2.52% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
18.5% of INFR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's money is in holdings INFR also owns.
INFR and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 245 days apart, INFR as of Nov 28, 2025 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
6 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in INFR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,144 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for INFR (96.8% of the fund), and 2 for INFR that do not appear in VTI (5.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of INFR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INFR or VTI?
INFR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, INFR or VTI?
INFR has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: INFR -35.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both INFR and VTI?
INFR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between INFR and VTI?
18.5% of INFR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.6% of VTI's is in holdings INFR also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in INFR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, INFR or VTI?
INFR yields 2.52% while VTI yields 1.03%, so INFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than INFR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. INFR led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.