INFR vs IVV
Clearbridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. INFR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | INFR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $12M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.52% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.31% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.37% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.21% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.39% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 29, 2016 | May 15, 2000 |
INFR vs IVV Performance
Clearbridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year INFR returned +26.37% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, INFR is up 0.31% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, INFR compounded at +5.21% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +0.39% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +3.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
INFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.8% for INFR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
INFR charges 0.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, INFR currently yields 2.52% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
INFR and IVV share 6 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, INFR or IVV?
INFR has an expense ratio of 0.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, INFR or IVV?
Over the past year INFR returned +26.37% vs +21.79% for IVV, so INFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), INFR annualized +3.53% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, INFR or IVV?
INFR has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: INFR -35.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both INFR and IVV?
INFR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between INFR and IVV?
INFR and IVV share 6 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, INFR or IVV?
INFR yields 2.52% while IVV yields 1.10%, so INFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.