IRVH vs VOO
Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IRVH | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.68% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.20% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | -4.36% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.29% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 5, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IRVH vs VOO Performance
Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IRVH returned -4.36% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, IRVH is down 4.20% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, IRVH compounded at +0.29% per year against +22.06% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs -2.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.1% for IRVH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for IRVH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IRVH charges 0.45% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IRVH currently yields 5.68% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IRVH and VOO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IRVH or VOO?
IRVH has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IRVH or VOO?
Over the past year IRVH returned -4.36% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IRVH annualized -2.11% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IRVH or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.1% for IRVH. Worst drawdown: IRVH -15.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IRVH and VOO?
IRVH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IRVH and VOO?
IRVH and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IRVH or VOO?
IRVH yields 5.68% while VOO yields 1.08%, so IRVH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.