IRVH vs VTI
Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IRVH or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IRVH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.92% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 86 | 3,542 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0%Best | 14.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.0%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $8,901 | $20,771Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 5, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 26 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. IRVH has data through Oct 16, 2026 and VTI through Nov 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 6, 2022 to Oct 16, 2026 (4.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 8.0% for IRVH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.0% for IRVH and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.31. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IRVH charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IRVH currently yields 5.92% against 1.06% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IRVH and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IRVH or VTI?
IRVH has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, IRVH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 8.0% for IRVH. Worst drawdown: IRVH -15.0% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both IRVH and VTI?
IRVH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.31, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IRVH or VTI?
IRVH yields 5.92% while VTI yields 1.06%, so IRVH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IRVH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.