ISRL vs VTI
Defiance KSM Israel 120 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ISRL or VTI?
ISRL has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ISRL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISRL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 119 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -3.28% | +11.86%Best |
| 1Y Return | +91.19%Best | +13.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.17%Best | +22.78% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.15% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.8% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.7%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.6 years | $23,216Best | $19,469 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Defiance ETFs, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 31, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 28, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 (3.6 years).
ISRL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.6 years both funds cover.
ISRL vs VTI Performance
Defiance KSM Israel 120 ETF (ISRL) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ISRL returned +91.19% while VTI returned +13.97%. Year to date, ISRL is down 3.28% versus a gain of 11.86% for VTI.
Over three years, ISRL compounded at +31.17% per year against +22.78% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, ISRL has the edge at +26.36% annualized vs +20.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ISRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.8% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.7% for ISRL and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISRL charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISRL currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of ISRL's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
ISRL and VTI share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 119 positions we hold weights for in ISRL and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 119 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,155 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ISRL (97.7% of the fund), and 9 for ISRL that do not appear in VTI (5.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ISRL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORAOrange - Adr | 1.10% | 0.01% | 1.09% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ISRL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISRL or VTI?
ISRL has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISRL or VTI?
Over the past year ISRL returned +91.19% vs +13.97% for VTI, so ISRL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), ISRL annualized +26.36% vs +20.33% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ISRL or VTI?
ISRL has been the more volatile fund at 53.8% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ISRL -10.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both ISRL and VTI?
ISRL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ISRL and VTI?
1.1% of ISRL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings ISRL also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 119 positions we hold weights for in ISRL and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISRL or VTI?
ISRL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ISRL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ISRL led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.