ISUL vs VTI
GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ISUL or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ISUL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.50% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 2 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -63.71% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | -44.23% | +20.00%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.95% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.81% |
| Fund Family | GraniteShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ISUL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ISUL vs VTI Performance
GraniteShares 2x Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) is an ETF from GraniteShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ISUL returned -44.23% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, ISUL is down 63.71% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ISUL charges 1.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $150 vs $3 annually, a gap of $147 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ISUL currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in ISUL and 2,788 in VTI, totalling 66.7% and 92.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in ISUL and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 2 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ISUL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ISUL or VTI?
ISUL has an expense ratio of 1.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $147 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ISUL or VTI?
Over the past year ISUL returned -44.23% vs +20.00% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ISUL or VTI?
ISUL yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ISUL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.