ITB vs IVV
iShares US Home Construction ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ITB or IVV?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITB | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 47 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -3.49% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.35% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.04% | +21.29%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.34% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.0% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -87.1% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,598 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 67.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 1, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 5, 2006 to Sep 4, 2026 (20.3 years).
ITB vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.3 years both funds cover.
ITB vs IVV Performance
iShares US Home Construction ETF (ITB) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ITB returned -17.35% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, ITB is down 3.49% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ITB compounded at +5.04% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +6.34% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.47% annualized vs +3.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ITB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.0% compared with 15.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.1% for ITB and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITB charges 0.37% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITB currently yields 0.67% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
64.3% of ITB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.2% of IVV's money is in holdings ITB also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in ITB and 505 in IVV, against full books of 47 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 44 and 505 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 486 positions ITB does not, 98.1% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ITB | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHIDr Horton Inc. | 16.40% | 0.06% | 16.34% |
| PHMPultegroup Inc. | 10.37% | 0.04% | 10.33% |
| LENLennar Corp. Class A | 7.74% | 0.03% | 7.71% |
| NVRNvr Inc. | 6.99% | 0.03% | 6.96% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 5.38% | 0.13% | 5.25% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 4.94% | 0.53% | 4.41% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 4.56% | 0.19% | 4.37% |
| MASMasco Corp. | 3.23% | 0.02% | 3.21% |
| LIILennox International Inc | 2.94% | 0.02% | 2.92% |
| BLDRBuilders Firstsource Inc | 1.69% | 0.01% | 1.68% |
64.3% of ITB is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITB or IVV?
ITB has an expense ratio of 0.37% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ITB or IVV?
Over the past year ITB returned -17.35% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ITB annualized +3.37% vs +9.47% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ITB or IVV?
ITB has been the more volatile fund at 31.0% annualized versus 15.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ITB -87.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ITB and IVV?
ITB and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ITB and IVV?
64.3% of ITB's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 1.2% of IVV's is in holdings ITB also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in ITB and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITB or IVV?
ITB yields 0.67% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ITB?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 67.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.