ITB vs VOO
iShares US Home Construction ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ITB or VOO?
Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ITB led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITB | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.37% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.3B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.68% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 47 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -9.36% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.02% | +17.31%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.83% | +23.16%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.09% | +13.85%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.3% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -52.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,439 | $19,128Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 68.2% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 1, 2006 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 21, 2026 (16 years).
ITB vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
ITB vs VOO Performance
iShares US Home Construction ETF (ITB) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ITB returned -17.02% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, ITB is down 9.36% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.
Over three years, ITB compounded at +4.83% per year against +23.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.09% and +13.85% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, ITB has the edge at +13.75% annualized vs +13.49%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ITB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.1% for ITB and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITB charges 0.37% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $37 vs $3 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITB currently yields 0.68% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
64.6% of ITB's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.0% of VOO's money is in holdings ITB also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in ITB and 494 in VOO, against full books of 47 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 43 and 494 positions we hold weights for.
VOO holds 477 positions ITB does not, 98.1% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.55%, AAPL 7.05%, MSFT 5.36%, AMZN 4.13%, GOOGL 3.24%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ITB | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHIDr Horton Inc. | 16.62% | 0.06% | 16.56% |
| PHMPultegroup Inc. | 10.49% | 0.04% | 10.45% |
| LENLennar Corp. Class A | 7.89% | 0.03% | 7.86% |
| NVRNvr Inc. | 7.43% | 0.03% | 7.40% |
| SHWSherwin Williams Co/the | 5.32% | 0.12% | 5.20% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 4.90% | 0.51% | 4.39% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 4.52% | 0.18% | 4.34% |
| MASMasco Corp. | 3.19% | 0.02% | 3.17% |
| LIILennox International Inc | 2.66% | 0.02% | 2.64% |
| BLDRBuilders Firstsource Inc | 1.57% | 0.01% | 1.56% |
64.6% of ITB is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITB or VOO?
ITB has an expense ratio of 0.37% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ITB or VOO?
Over the past year ITB returned -17.02% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ITB annualized +13.75% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ITB or VOO?
ITB has been the more volatile fund at 27.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ITB -52.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ITB and VOO?
ITB and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ITB and VOO?
64.6% of ITB's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.0% of VOO's is in holdings ITB also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in ITB and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITB or VOO?
ITB yields 0.68% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ITB?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ITB led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.