ITDF vs VOO
ITDF vs VOO
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ITDF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITDF | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $83M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.65% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.07% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ITDF vs VOO Performance
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ITDF returned +24.07% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, ITDF is up 13.65% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.3% for ITDF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ITDF and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITDF charges 0.11% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITDF currently yields 1.48% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ITDF and VOO share 0 holdings out of 517 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITDF or VOO?
ITDF has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ITDF or VOO?
Over the past year ITDF returned +24.07% vs +23.71% for VOO, so ITDF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ITDF annualized +23.64% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ITDF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.3% for ITDF. Worst drawdown: ITDF -15.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ITDF and VOO?
ITDF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ITDF and VOO?
ITDF and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 517 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITDF or VOO?
ITDF yields 1.48% while VOO yields 1.09%, so ITDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.