ITDF vs VXUS
ITDF vs VXUS
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITDF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $83M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +13.65% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.07% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ITDF vs VXUS Performance
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ITDF returned +24.07% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, ITDF is up 13.65% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 11.3% for ITDF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ITDF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITDF charges 0.11% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $5 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITDF currently yields 1.48% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ITDF and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7873 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITDF or VXUS?
ITDF has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ITDF or VXUS?
Over the past year ITDF returned +24.07% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ITDF annualized +23.64% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ITDF or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 11.3% for ITDF. Worst drawdown: ITDF -15.7% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ITDF and VXUS?
ITDF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ITDF and VXUS?
ITDF and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7873 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITDF or VXUS?
ITDF yields 1.48% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.