ITDF vs VTI
ITDF vs VTI
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ITDF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.11% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $83M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.65% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.07% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 17, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
ITDF vs VTI Performance
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ITDF returned +24.07% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, ITDF is up 13.65% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.3% for ITDF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ITDF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ITDF charges 0.11% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $11 vs $3 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ITDF currently yields 1.48% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ITDF and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ITDF or VTI?
ITDF has an expense ratio of 0.11% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ITDF or VTI?
Over the past year ITDF returned +24.07% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ITDF annualized +23.64% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ITDF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.3% for ITDF. Worst drawdown: ITDF -15.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ITDF and VTI?
ITDF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between ITDF and VTI?
ITDF and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ITDF or VTI?
ITDF yields 1.48% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ITDF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.