IVOG vs SCHD
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, IVOG or SCHD?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. IVOG led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVOG is less concentrated, with 13.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVOG | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.55% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 249 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +12.46% | +23.46%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.92% | +27.20%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.03% | +15.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.54% | +10.16%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 13.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,383 | $16,223Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.8%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 20, 2011 to Sep 18, 2026 (14.9 years).
IVOG vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
IVOG vs SCHD Performance
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IVOG returned +13.92% while SCHD returned +27.20%. Year to date, IVOG is up 12.46% versus a gain of 23.46% for SCHD.
Over three years, IVOG compounded at +15.03% per year against +15.41% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +7.54% and +10.16% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVOG has the edge at +11.96% annualized vs +11.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.3% for IVOG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVOG charges 0.10% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $6 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVOG currently yields 0.55% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of IVOG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.6% of SCHD's money is in holdings IVOG also owns.
IVOG and SCHD share little of their money.
9 positions in common, counted across the 246 positions we hold weights for in IVOG and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 249 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 90 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for IVOG (98.3% of the fund), and 230 for IVOG that do not appear in SCHD (92.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVOG | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EWBCEast West Bancorp, Inc. | 0.50% | 0.42% | 0.08% |
| ORIOld Republic International Corp | 0.28% | 0.23% | 0.05% |
| ALVAllianz Ag | 0.29% | 0.20% | 0.09% |
| AFGAmerican Financial Group Inc/Oh | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.03% |
| FHIFederated Investors Inc. | 0.24% | 0.11% | 0.13% |
| NXSTNexstar Media Group Inc | 0.17% | 0.13% | 0.04% |
| MTNVail Resorts Inc. | 0.14% | 0.12% | 0.02% |
| MSMMsc Industrial Direct Co Inc | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
| LANCLancaster Colony Corp | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVOG and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVOG or SCHD?
IVOG has an expense ratio of 0.10% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVOG or SCHD?
Over the past year IVOG returned +13.92% vs +27.20% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IVOG annualized +11.96% vs +11.25% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVOG or SCHD?
IVOG has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: IVOG -39.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both IVOG and SCHD?
IVOG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVOG and SCHD?
2.0% of IVOG's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.6% of SCHD's is in holdings IVOG also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 246 positions we hold weights for in IVOG and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVOG or SCHD?
IVOG yields 0.55% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than IVOG?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. IVOG led over the full window, SCHD over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. IVOG is less concentrated, with 13.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.