IVV vs IXN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Which is better, IVV or IXN?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | IXN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.37% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $9.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.78% |
| Holdings | 508 | 145 |
| YTD Return | +14.14% | +41.09%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.30% | +45.93%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | +37.86%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.63% | +21.20%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.8%Best | 20.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -56.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,944 | $26,152Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 62.5% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 12, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2001 to Sep 22, 2026 (24.8 years).
IVV vs IXN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 24.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs IXN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while IXN returned +45.93%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.14% versus a gain of 41.09% for IXN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +23.04% per year against +37.86% for IXN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.63% and +21.20% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, IXN has the edge at +12.00% annualized vs +8.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IXN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.9% compared with 14.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -56.3% for IXN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while IXN charges 0.37%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $37 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.78% for IXN.
Holdings Overlap
37.8% of IVV's money is in holdings IXN also owns. 77.2% of IXN's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of IXN is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
73 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 127 in IXN, against full books of 508 and 145.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for IXN that do not appear in our book for IVV (4.1% of the fund), and 409 for IVV that do not appear in IXN (60.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in IXN | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 14.66% | 6.59% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 12.76% | 5.74% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 10.33% | 4.64% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 4.81% | 2.16% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 3.94% | 2.31% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 2.80% | 1.64% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.67% | 1.61% | 0.94% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.66% | 1.59% | 0.93% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 1.56% | 0.91% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 0.57% | 1.38% | 0.81% |
77.2% of IXN is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or IXN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while IXN charges 0.37%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or IXN?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs +45.93% for IXN, so IXN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), IVV annualized +8.36% vs +12.00% for IXN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or IXN?
IXN has been the more volatile fund at 20.9% annualized versus 14.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs IXN -56.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and IXN?
IVV and IXN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and IXN?
77.2% of IXN's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 77.2% of IXN's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 127 in IXN.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or IXN?
IVV yields 1.06% while IXN yields 0.78%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IXN better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IXN led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.