IVV vs JETS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs US Global Jets ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $867M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.74% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 50 | |
| YTD Return | +12.96% | +7.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.70% | +18.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10% | +16.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.40% | +6.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 30.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -64.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | U.S. Global Investors, Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 30, 2015 |
IVV vs JETS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and US Global Jets ETF (JETS) is a ETF from U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% while JETS returned +18.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.96% versus a gain of 7.18% for JETS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.10% per year against +16.65% for JETS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.40% and +6.95% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +2.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JETS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -64.9% for JETS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JETS charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.74% for JETS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and JETS share 7 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JETS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JETS charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or JETS?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.70% vs +18.90% for JETS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.01% vs +2.58% for JETS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or JETS?
JETS has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JETS -64.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and JETS?
IVV and JETS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JETS?
IVV and JETS share 7 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JETS?
IVV yields 1.10% while JETS yields 0.74%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.