IVV vs JETS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs US Global Jets ETF
Which is better, IVV or JETS?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | JETS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $783M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.74% |
| Holdings | 508 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +13.39%Best | +1.80% |
| 1Y Return | +20.08%Best | +11.81% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29%Best | +15.42% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +5.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 30.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -64.9% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $12,775 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 61.8% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | U.S. Global Investors, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 30, 2015 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 30, 2015 to Sep 4, 2026 (11.3 years).
IVV vs JETS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.3 years both funds cover.
IVV vs JETS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and US Global Jets ETF (JETS) is an ETF from U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while JETS returned +11.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 1.80% for JETS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +15.42% for JETS; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +5.02% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.95% annualized vs +2.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JETS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -64.9% for JETS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while JETS charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.74% for JETS.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of IVV's money is in holdings JETS also owns. 41.5% of JETS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 49 in JETS, against full books of 508 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for JETS that do not appear in our book for IVV (32.5% of the fund), and 485 for IVV that do not appear in JETS (98.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in JETS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UALUnited Airlines Holdings, Inc. | 0.06% | 10.56% | 10.50% |
| DALDelta Air Lines Inc. | 0.09% | 10.36% | 10.27% |
| LUVSouthwest Airlines Co. | 0.04% | 9.42% | 9.38% |
| EXPEExpedia Group Inc. | 0.06% | 2.85% | 2.79% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.24% | 2.53% | 2.29% |
| GDGeneral Dynamics Corp. | 0.15% | 2.13% | 1.98% |
| BABoeing Co | 0.28% | 1.92% | 1.64% |
| TXTTextron Inc Sr Unsec | 0.02% | 1.78% | 1.76% |
41.5% of JETS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or JETS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JETS charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or JETS?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +11.81% for JETS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +12.95% vs +2.11% for JETS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or JETS?
JETS has been the more volatile fund at 30.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs JETS -64.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and JETS?
IVV and JETS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JETS?
41.5% of JETS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 41.5% of JETS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 49 in JETS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JETS?
IVV yields 1.10% while JETS yields 0.74%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JETS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.