IVV vs KIE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KIE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $710M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.52% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +7.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +9.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +16.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +11.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -76.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 8, 2005 |
IVV vs KIE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while KIE returned +9.43%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 7.51% for KIE.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +16.94% for KIE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +11.75% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KIE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -76.2% for KIE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KIE charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.52% for KIE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KIE share 22 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KIE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KIE charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KIE?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +9.43% for KIE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +6.81% for KIE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KIE?
KIE has been the more volatile fund at 21.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KIE -76.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and KIE?
IVV and KIE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KIE?
IVV and KIE share 22 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KIE?
IVV yields 1.10% while KIE yields 1.52%, so KIE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.