IVV vs KNGZ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Which is better, IVV or KNGZ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, KNGZ over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. KNGZ is less concentrated, with 36.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KNGZ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $67M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.43% |
| Holdings | 508 | 198 |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +19.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.48% | +22.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21%Best | +17.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95%Best | +10.61% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0%Best | 17.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -37.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384Best | $16,557 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 36.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 20, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 22, 2017 to Sep 14, 2026 (9.2 years).
IVV vs KNGZ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs KNGZ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while KNGZ returned +22.57%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a gain of 19.29% for KNGZ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.21% per year against +17.49% for KNGZ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +10.61% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.04% annualized vs +10.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KNGZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 16.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -37.5% for KNGZ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KNGZ charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.43% for KNGZ.
Holdings Overlap
21.7% of IVV's money is in holdings KNGZ also owns. 97.1% of KNGZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of KNGZ is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
94 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in KNGZ, against full books of 508 and 198.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 3 positions for KNGZ that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.2% of the fund), and 389 for IVV that do not appear in KNGZ (77.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in KNGZ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 2.00% | 3.69% |
| ACN:IEAccenture PLC Cl A | 0.18% | 5.14% | 4.96% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 0.33% | 4.32% | 3.99% |
| HPQHp Inc. | 0.04% | 4.54% | 4.50% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.32% | 3.78% | 3.46% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.27% | 3.59% | 3.32% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 0.96% | 1.69% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.36% | 3.10% | 2.74% |
| MCHPMicrochip Technology Inc. | 0.06% | 3.20% | 3.14% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 0.14% | 3.05% | 2.91% |
97.1% of KNGZ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KNGZ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KNGZ charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or KNGZ?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs +22.57% for KNGZ, so KNGZ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +14.04% vs +10.21% for KNGZ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or KNGZ?
KNGZ has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 16.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs KNGZ -37.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and KNGZ?
IVV and KNGZ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KNGZ?
97.1% of KNGZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 97.1% of KNGZ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 94 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in KNGZ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KNGZ?
IVV yields 1.06% while KNGZ yields 2.43%, so KNGZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KNGZ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, KNGZ over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. KNGZ is less concentrated, with 36.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.