KNGZ vs SCHD
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, KNGZ or SCHD?
Each has led over a different period.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KNGZ led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. KNGZ is less concentrated, with 36.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KNGZ | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $67M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.43% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 198 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +19.29% | +25.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.57% | +30.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.49%Best | +16.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.61%Best | +10.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -37.5% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,557Best | $16,230 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.2%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2017 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 22, 2017 to Sep 14, 2026 (9.2 years).
KNGZ vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.2 years both funds cover.
KNGZ vs SCHD Performance
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year KNGZ returned +22.57% while SCHD returned +30.22%. Year to date, KNGZ is up 19.29% versus a gain of 25.88% for SCHD.
Over three years, KNGZ compounded at +17.49% per year against +16.05% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.61% and +10.17% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.57% annualized vs +10.21%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KNGZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.8% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -37.5% for KNGZ and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KNGZ charges 0.50% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $6 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KNGZ currently yields 2.43% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
31.9% of KNGZ's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 58.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings KNGZ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in KNGZ and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 198 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 72 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for KNGZ (41.8% of the fund), and 69 for KNGZ that do not appear in SCHD (62.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KNGZ | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.78% | 3.97% | 0.19% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 3.10% | 3.13% | 0.03% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.59% | 2.52% | 1.07% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.70% | 4.77% | 4.07% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.70% | 4.69% | 3.99% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 3.05% | 2.31% | 0.74% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.84% | 4.02% | 3.18% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.82% | 3.88% | 3.06% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 1.10% | 3.33% | 2.23% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.46% | 3.82% | 3.36% |
58.1% of SCHD is already inside KNGZ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KNGZ or SCHD?
KNGZ has an expense ratio of 0.50% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KNGZ or SCHD?
Over the past year KNGZ returned +22.57% vs +30.22% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), KNGZ annualized +10.21% vs +11.57% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KNGZ or SCHD?
KNGZ has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.8% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: KNGZ -37.5% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both KNGZ and SCHD?
KNGZ and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KNGZ and SCHD?
58.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings KNGZ also owns. 58.1% of SCHD's is in holdings KNGZ also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in KNGZ and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, KNGZ or SCHD?
KNGZ yields 2.43% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than KNGZ?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. KNGZ led over 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. KNGZ is less concentrated, with 36.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.