IVV vs KOID
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. KOID delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | KOID | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.69% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $318M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.75% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 57 | |
| YTD Return | +13.22% | +14.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +29.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.17% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.42% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 32.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | KraneShares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 1, 2020 |
IVV vs KOID Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and KraneShares Global Humanoid Robotics and Physical AI Index ETF (KOID) is a ETF from KraneShares. Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% while KOID returned +29.72%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.22% versus a gain of 14.58% for KOID.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KOID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.6% for KOID. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while KOID charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $69 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.75% for KOID.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and KOID share 8 holdings out of 546 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or KOID?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KOID charges 0.69%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or KOID?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.62% vs +29.72% for KOID, so KOID leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +38.52% for KOID. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or KOID?
KOID has been the more volatile fund at 32.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs KOID -19.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and KOID?
IVV and KOID have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and KOID?
IVV and KOID share 8 common holdings with a 4.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 546 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KOID?
IVV yields 1.10% while KOID yields 0.75%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.