IVV vs KSLV

IVV vs KSLV

Which is better, IVV or KSLV?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVKSLV
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.99%
AUM$850.0B$107M
Dividend Yield1.09%41.43%
Holdings1,01829
YTD Return+12.12%Best-42.18%
1Y Return+12.53%Best-19.26%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.54%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.93%-
Volatility (annualized)12.4%Best55.4%
Max Drawdown-8.9%Best-66.8%
$10,000 over 1.1 years$11,515Best$8,791
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Kurv
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 29, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.1 years).

IVV vs KSLV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.

IVV vs KSLV Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF (KSLV) is an ETF from Kurv. Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% while KSLV returned -19.26%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.12% versus a loss of 42.18% for KSLV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

KSLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.4% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -66.8% for KSLV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while KSLV charges 0.99%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $99 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 41.43% for KSLV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IVV and KSLV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IVVKSLV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or KSLV?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while KSLV charges 0.99%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $96 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IVV or KSLV?

Over the past year IVV returned +12.53% vs -19.26% for KSLV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +13.68% vs -11.05% for KSLV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IVV or KSLV?

KSLV has been the more volatile fund at 55.4% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs KSLV -66.8%.

Should I hold both IVV and KSLV?

IVV and KSLV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or KSLV?

IVV yields 1.09% while KSLV yields 41.43%, so KSLV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is KSLV better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.