IVV vs LIMI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. LIMI delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | LIMI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.37% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | -10.01% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +43.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 39.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -43.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Themes ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 23, 2024 |
IVV vs LIMI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) is a ETF from Themes ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while LIMI returned +43.96%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a loss of 10.01% for LIMI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
LIMI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -43.8% for LIMI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while LIMI charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.37% for LIMI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and LIMI share 1 holdings out of 551 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in LIMI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALB | 0.02% | 8.59% | 8.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or LIMI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while LIMI charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or LIMI?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +43.96% for LIMI, so LIMI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +35.80% for LIMI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or LIMI?
LIMI has been the more volatile fund at 39.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs LIMI -43.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and LIMI?
IVV and LIMI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and LIMI?
IVV and LIMI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 551 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or LIMI?
IVV yields 1.09% while LIMI yields 0.37%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.