IVV vs MCDS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF
Which is better, IVV or MCDS?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. MCDS is less concentrated, with 13.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MCDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 508 | 207 |
| YTD Return | +12.27%Best | +12.11% |
| 1Y Return | +17.04%Best | +15.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.24% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.08% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4%Best | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -22.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,711Best | $13,218 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 13.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 7, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2024 to Sep 17, 2026 (2.1 years).
IVV vs MCDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MCDS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF (MCDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% while MCDS returned +15.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.27% versus a gain of 12.11% for MCDS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MCDS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 12.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -22.5% for MCDS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MCDS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.04% for MCDS.
Holdings Overlap
7.2% of IVV's money is in holdings MCDS also owns. 62.8% of MCDS's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
118 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 204 in MCDS, against full books of 508 and 207.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 80 positions for MCDS that do not appear in our book for IVV (34.2% of the fund), and 365 for IVV that do not appear in MCDS (91.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MCDS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.16% | 1.59% | 1.43% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.10% | 1.21% | 1.11% |
| STTState Street Corp. | 0.08% | 1.20% | 1.12% |
| CAHCardinal Health Inc. | 0.08% | 1.13% | 1.05% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 0.08% | 0.98% | 0.90% |
| MTBM&T Bank Corp | 0.05% | 0.99% | 0.94% |
| RJFRaymond James Financial Inc. | 0.05% | 0.97% | 0.92% |
| DGXQuest Diagnostics Inc | 0.04% | 0.93% | 0.89% |
| DOVDover Corp. | 0.04% | 0.90% | 0.86% |
| ACGLArch Capital Group Ltd 5.450% | 0.05% | 0.88% | 0.83% |
62.8% of MCDS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MCDS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MCDS charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MCDS?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.04% vs +15.48% for MCDS, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +20.18% vs +14.21% for MCDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MCDS?
MCDS has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 12.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MCDS -22.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and MCDS?
IVV and MCDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MCDS?
62.8% of MCDS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 62.8% of MCDS's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 118 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 204 in MCDS.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MCDS?
IVV yields 1.06% while MCDS yields 1.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MCDS better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. MCDS is less concentrated, with 13.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.