IVV vs MUSQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MUSQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.76% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $21M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.71% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 32 | |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | -9.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.24% | -13.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +3.23% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.84% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 6, 2023 |
IVV vs MUSQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) is a ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% while MUSQ returned -13.10%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a loss of 9.64% for MUSQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.78% per year against +3.23% for MUSQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +1.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MUSQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.1% for MUSQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MUSQ charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $76 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.71% for MUSQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MUSQ share 4 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MUSQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MUSQ charges 0.76%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MUSQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.24% vs -13.10% for MUSQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.98% vs +1.18% for MUSQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MUSQ?
MUSQ has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MUSQ -23.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MUSQ?
IVV and MUSQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MUSQ?
IVV and MUSQ share 4 common holdings with a 11.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MUSQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while MUSQ yields 0.71%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.