IVV vs MUSQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or MUSQ?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MUSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.76% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $21M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 508 | 27 |
| YTD Return | +12.01%Best | -8.76% |
| 1Y Return | +16.48%Best | -14.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.21%Best | +2.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8%Best | 15.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -23.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $18,090Best | $10,475 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 64.3% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Exchange Traded Concepts Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 6, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 7, 2023 to Sep 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
IVV vs MUSQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MUSQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and MUSQ Global Music Industry Index ETF (MUSQ) is an ETF from Exchange Traded Concepts Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% while MUSQ returned -14.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.01% versus a loss of 8.76% for MUSQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.21% per year against +2.76% for MUSQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MUSQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.2% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -23.1% for MUSQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MUSQ charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $76 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.69% for MUSQ.
Holdings Overlap
13.9% of IVV's money is in holdings MUSQ also owns. 23.9% of MUSQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
MUSQ and IVV share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in MUSQ, against full books of 508 and 27.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 9 positions for MUSQ that do not appear in our book for IVV (31.7% of the fund), and 478 for IVV that do not appear in MUSQ (84.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
23.9% of MUSQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MUSQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MUSQ charges 0.76%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MUSQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.48% vs -14.55% for MUSQ, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MUSQ?
MUSQ has been the more volatile fund at 15.2% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MUSQ -23.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MUSQ?
IVV and MUSQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MUSQ?
23.9% of MUSQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 23.9% of MUSQ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 26 in MUSQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MUSQ?
IVV yields 1.06% while MUSQ yields 0.69%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MUSQ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.