IVV vs MVAL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or MVAL?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.58% |
| Holdings | 508 | 46 |
| YTD Return | +12.39%Best | +1.61% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61%Best | +7.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 12.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $15,074Best | $12,209 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 40.1% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 26, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.5 years).
IVV vs MVAL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MVAL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF (MVAL) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while MVAL returned +7.59%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 1.61% for MVAL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.8% compared with 12.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.6% for MVAL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MVAL charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.58% for MVAL.
Holdings Overlap
11.5% of IVV's money is in holdings MVAL also owns. 83.7% of MVAL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of MVAL is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
38 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 45 in MVAL, against full books of 508 and 46.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 490 and 45 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 444 positions MVAL does not, 87.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.07%, AAPL 7.02%, AMZN 3.84%, GOOGL 3.00%, AVGO 2.65%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MVAL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 3.30% | 2.39% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 0.21% | 4.89% | 4.68% |
| DHRDanaher Corporation | 0.20% | 4.53% | 4.33% |
| ZBHZimmer Biomet Holdings | 0.03% | 4.60% | 4.57% |
| KVUEKenvue Inc | 0.05% | 4.40% | 4.35% |
| CLXClorox Co. | 0.02% | 3.80% | 3.78% |
| STZConstellation Brands Inc Common Stock Usd 0.01 | 0.03% | 3.77% | 3.74% |
| GEHCGe Healthcare Technologies Inc | 0.05% | 3.70% | 3.65% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.25% | 0.65% |
| SCHWSchwab Strategic T | 0.27% | 2.83% | 2.56% |
83.7% of MVAL is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MVAL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MVAL charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MVAL?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +7.59% for MVAL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MVAL?
MVAL has been the more volatile fund at 12.8% annualized versus 12.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MVAL -19.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and MVAL?
IVV and MVAL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MVAL?
83.7% of MVAL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 83.7% of MVAL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 45 in MVAL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MVAL?
IVV yields 1.06% while MVAL yields 1.58%, so MVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MVAL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.