IVV vs MVFD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF
Which is better, IVV or MVFD?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. MVFD is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MVFD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.10% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $130M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.47% |
| Holdings | 508 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +14.15%Best | +6.56% |
| 1Y Return | +17.31%Best | +14.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1%Best | 13.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -19.1% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $15,432Best | $12,564 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 31.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2024 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.5 years).
IVV vs MVFD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs MVFD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) is an ETF from Monarch Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while MVFD returned +14.33%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a gain of 6.56% for MVFD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MVFD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 12.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -19.1% for MVFD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MVFD charges 1.10%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $110 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.47% for MVFD.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of IVV's money is in holdings MVFD also owns. 36.6% of MVFD's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 40 in MVFD, against full books of 508 and 42.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 25 positions for MVFD that do not appear in our book for IVV (60.5% of the fund), and 468 for IVV that do not appear in MVFD (97.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MVFD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 0.16% | 3.30% | 3.14% |
| APAApa Corp | 0.02% | 3.19% | 3.17% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 0.14% | 2.98% | 2.84% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.10% | 2.98% | 2.88% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 0.03% | 2.90% | 2.87% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.32% | 2.49% | 2.17% |
| SJMJ M Smucker Co/The | 0.02% | 2.78% | 2.76% |
| CHDChurch & Dwight Co. Inc. | 0.04% | 2.60% | 2.56% |
| EQTEQT Corp. | 0.05% | 2.59% | 2.54% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.11% | 2.27% | 2.16% |
36.6% of MVFD is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MVFD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MVFD charges 1.10%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $107 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or MVFD?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs +14.33% for MVFD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or MVFD?
MVFD has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 12.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs MVFD -19.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MVFD?
IVV and MVFD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MVFD?
36.6% of MVFD's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 36.6% of MVFD's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 40 in MVFD.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MVFD?
IVV yields 1.06% while MVFD yields 1.47%, so MVFD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MVFD better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. MVFD is less concentrated, with 31.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.