IVV vs MVFD
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MVFD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.19% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $121M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.55% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +8.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +20.04% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Monarch Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 12, 2024 |
IVV vs MVFD Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Monarch Volume Factor Dividend Tree Index ETF (MVFD) is a ETF from Monarch Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while MVFD returned +20.04%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 8.62% for MVFD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for MVFD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.1% for MVFD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MVFD charges 1.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $119 annually, a gap of $116 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.55% for MVFD.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MVFD share 17 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MVFD?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MVFD charges 1.19%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $116 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MVFD?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +20.04% for MVFD, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +10.88% for MVFD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MVFD?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for MVFD. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MVFD -19.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and MVFD?
IVV and MVFD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MVFD?
IVV and MVFD share 17 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MVFD?
IVV yields 1.09% while MVFD yields 1.55%, so MVFD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.