IVV vs NETL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NETL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $55M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 4.61% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +14.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +13.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +9.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +1.53% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -51.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Net Lease ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 21, 2019 |
IVV vs NETL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF (NETL) is a ETF from Net Lease ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while NETL returned +13.21%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 14.63% for NETL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +9.95% for NETL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +1.53% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +4.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NETL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -51.5% for NETL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NETL charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 4.61% for NETL.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NETL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NETL charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NETL?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +13.21% for NETL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +4.69% for NETL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NETL?
NETL has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NETL -51.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and NETL?
IVV and NETL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NETL?
IVV and NETL share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NETL?
IVV yields 1.10% while NETL yields 4.61%, so NETL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.