IVV vs NETL
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF
Which is better, IVV or NETL?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NETL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $55M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 4.61% |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +10.80% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +8.21% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +8.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +1.19% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Best | 21.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -51.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $10,609 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 60.6% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Net Lease ETF |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 21, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 22, 2019 to Sep 10, 2026 (7.5 years).
IVV vs NETL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NETL Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF (NETL) is an ETF from Net Lease ETF. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while NETL returned +8.21%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 10.80% for NETL.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +8.01% for NETL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +1.19% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.44% annualized vs +4.18%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NETL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 16.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -51.5% for NETL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NETL charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 4.61% for NETL.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings NETL also owns. 15.5% of NETL's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
NETL and IVV share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in NETL, against full books of 508 and 24.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 23 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 493 positions NETL does not, 99.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and NETL you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NETL?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NETL charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NETL?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +8.21% for NETL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +15.44% vs +4.18% for NETL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NETL?
NETL has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 16.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs NETL -51.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and NETL?
IVV and NETL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NETL?
15.5% of NETL's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 15.5% of NETL's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 23 in NETL.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NETL?
IVV yields 1.06% while NETL yields 4.61%, so NETL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NETL better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.