NETL vs VYM
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NETL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $55M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.61% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.82% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.60% | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Net Lease ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
NETL vs VYM Performance
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF (NETL) is a ETF from Net Lease ETF and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NETL returned +13.82% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, NETL is up 14.48% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, NETL compounded at +10.04% per year against +19.07% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +1.60% and +12.50% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NETL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.5% for NETL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NETL charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NETL currently yields 4.61% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
NETL and VYM share 0 holdings out of 626 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NETL or VYM?
NETL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NETL or VYM?
Over the past year NETL returned +13.82% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), NETL annualized +4.67% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NETL or VYM?
NETL has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: NETL -51.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both NETL and VYM?
NETL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NETL and VYM?
NETL and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 626 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NETL or VYM?
NETL yields 4.61% while VYM yields 2.24%, so NETL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.