NETL vs VXUS
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NETL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $55M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.61% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 24 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.60% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.57% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.49% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.27% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -51.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Net Lease ETF | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 21, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
NETL vs VXUS Performance
Colterpoint Net Lease Real Estate ETF (NETL) is a ETF from Net Lease ETF and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NETL returned +15.57% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, NETL is up 14.60% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, NETL compounded at +9.49% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.27% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +4.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NETL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.5% for NETL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NETL charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NETL currently yields 4.61% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
NETL and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7892 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NETL or VXUS?
NETL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NETL or VXUS?
Over the past year NETL returned +15.57% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), NETL annualized +4.70% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NETL or VXUS?
NETL has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NETL -51.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both NETL and VXUS?
NETL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NETL and VXUS?
NETL and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NETL or VXUS?
NETL yields 4.61% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so NETL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.