IVV vs NTSX
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, IVV or NTSX?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NTSX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.20% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 508 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +11.03%Best | +7.58% |
| 1Y Return | +15.62%Best | +10.30% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.81%Best | +18.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.61%Best | +7.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -31.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,109Best | $14,531 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Aug 2, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 2, 2018 to Sep 16, 2026 (8.1 years).
IVV vs NTSX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.1 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NTSX Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% while NTSX returned +10.30%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.03% versus a gain of 7.58% for NTSX.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.81% per year against +18.41% for NTSX; over five years the annualized figures are +12.61% and +7.76% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.90% annualized vs +11.85%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 16.3% for NTSX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -31.3% for NTSX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NTSX charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.07% for NTSX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 94.2% of IVV's money is in holdings NTSX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSX, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of IVV is already inside NTSX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
407 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 501 in NTSX, against full books of 508 and 506.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NTSX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 7.49% | 0.58% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 6.60% | 0.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 4.94% | 0.75% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 5.46% | 2.46% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 3.52% | 0.32% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 2.17% | 0.48% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 1.97% | 0.07% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.38% | 0.25% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.56% | 1.41% | 0.15% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 1.52% | 0.14% |
94.2% of IVV is already inside NTSX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NTSX?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NTSX charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NTSX?
Over the past year IVV returned +15.62% vs +10.30% for NTSX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +13.90% vs +11.85% for NTSX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NTSX?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 16.3% for NTSX. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs NTSX -31.3%.
Should I hold both IVV and NTSX?
IVV and NTSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NTSX?
At least 94.2% of IVV's money is in holdings NTSX also owns. Our book for NTSX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 407 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 501 in NTSX.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NTSX?
IVV yields 1.06% while NTSX yields 1.07%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSX better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.