IVV vs NXTG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Indxx NextG ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. NXTG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NXTG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.70% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $539M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.15% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +43.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +56.83% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +33.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +17.13% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 17.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -33.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 17, 2011 |
IVV vs NXTG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Indxx NextG ETF (NXTG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while NXTG returned +56.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 43.27% for NXTG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +33.06% for NXTG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +17.13% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, NXTG has the edge at +12.15% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -33.6% for NXTG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NXTG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.15% for NXTG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and NXTG share 31 holdings out of 573 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NXTG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NXTG charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or NXTG?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +56.83% for NXTG, so NXTG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +12.15% for NXTG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or NXTG?
NXTG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs NXTG -33.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NXTG?
IVV and NXTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NXTG?
IVV and NXTG share 31 common holdings with a 11.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NXTG?
IVV yields 1.09% while NXTG yields 1.15%, so NXTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.