IVV vs NXTG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs First Trust Indxx NextG ETF
Which is better, IVV or NXTG?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, NXTG over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. NXTG is less concentrated, with 15.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | NXTG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.70% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $565M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.27% |
| Holdings | 508 | 217 |
| YTD Return | +12.70% | +42.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | +55.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | +32.57%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.75% | +16.47%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2%Best | 17.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -33.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,221 | $21,432Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 15.5%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Feb 17, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 22, 2011 to Sep 8, 2026 (15.5 years).
IVV vs NXTG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs NXTG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and First Trust Indxx NextG ETF (NXTG) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% while NXTG returned +55.97%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.70% versus a gain of 42.29% for NXTG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +32.57% for NXTG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.75% and +16.47% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.54% annualized vs +12.04%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NXTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -33.6% for NXTG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while NXTG charges 0.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $70 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.27% for NXTG.
Holdings Overlap
25.2% of IVV's money is in holdings NXTG also owns. 35.8% of NXTG's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
30 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 99 in NXTG, against full books of 508 and 217.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for NXTG that do not appear in our book for IVV (5.2% of the fund), and 463 for IVV that do not appear in NXTG (74.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in NXTG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 1.44% | 6.54% |
| AAPLApple Inc Ord | 6.86% | 1.41% | 5.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 1.48% | 1.50% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.32% | 0.19% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.18% | 1.41% | 0.23% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc | 0.72% | 1.35% | 0.63% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 0.31% | 1.72% | 1.41% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 0.72% | 1.25% | 0.53% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | 0.11% | 1.54% | 1.43% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.28% | 1.27% | 0.99% |
35.8% of NXTG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or NXTG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while NXTG charges 0.70%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or NXTG?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% vs +55.97% for NXTG, so NXTG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IVV annualized +12.54% vs +12.04% for NXTG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or NXTG?
NXTG has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs NXTG -33.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and NXTG?
IVV and NXTG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and NXTG?
35.8% of NXTG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 35.8% of NXTG's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 30 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 99 in NXTG.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or NXTG?
IVV yields 1.10% while NXTG yields 1.27%, so NXTG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NXTG better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, NXTG over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. NXTG is less concentrated, with 15.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.