IVV vs PRN
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. PRN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PRN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $428M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.08% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 | |
| YTD Return | +13.43% | +21.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.61% | +34.32% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | +27.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | +16.91% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 21.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -59.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 12, 2006 |
IVV vs PRN Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% while PRN returned +34.32%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.43% versus a gain of 21.82% for PRN.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.47% per year against +27.15% for PRN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.26% and +16.91% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PRN has the edge at +12.11% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -59.9% for PRN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRN charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.08% for PRN.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PRN share 9 holdings out of 534 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PRN?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRN charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PRN?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.61% vs +34.32% for PRN, so PRN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +12.11% for PRN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PRN?
PRN has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PRN -59.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and PRN?
IVV and PRN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRN?
IVV and PRN share 9 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 534 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRN?
IVV yields 1.09% while PRN yields 0.08%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.