PRN vs VXUS
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. PRN delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $428M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +21.82% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.32% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.15% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.91% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PRN vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRN returned +34.32% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, PRN is up 21.82% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, PRN compounded at +27.15% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +16.91% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, PRN has the edge at +12.11% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.9% for PRN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRN charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRN currently yields 0.08% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PRN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7899 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRN or VXUS?
PRN has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRN or VXUS?
Over the past year PRN returned +34.32% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so PRN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PRN annualized +12.11% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRN or VXUS?
PRN has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PRN -59.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PRN and VXUS?
PRN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRN and VXUS?
PRN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7899 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRN or VXUS?
PRN yields 0.08% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.