IVV vs PTF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. PTF delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.60% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $601M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.01% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 40 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +32.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +55.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.77% | +31.14% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +15.45% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 25.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -55.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 12, 2006 |
IVV vs PTF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% while PTF returned +55.11%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 32.12% for PTF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.77% per year against +31.14% for PTF; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +15.45% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PTF has the edge at +13.63% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -55.4% for PTF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTF charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.01% for PTF.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PTF share 13 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTF charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PTF?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.01% vs +55.11% for PTF, so PTF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +13.63% for PTF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTF?
PTF has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTF -55.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTF?
IVV and PTF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTF?
IVV and PTF share 13 common holdings with a 14.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTF?
IVV yields 1.09% while PTF yields 0.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.