IVV vs PTF
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
Which is better, IVV or PTF?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. PTF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PTF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $563M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.01% |
| Holdings | 508 | 41 |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +26.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.08% | +48.79%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.29% | +27.03%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | +13.35%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 25.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -55.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327 | $18,711Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9%Best | 39.4% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 12, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2006 to Sep 4, 2026 (19.9 years).
IVV vs PTF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs PTF Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% while PTF returned +48.79%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.39% versus a gain of 26.76% for PTF.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.29% per year against +27.03% for PTF; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +13.35% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PTF has the edge at +13.34% annualized vs +9.53%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.1% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -55.4% for PTF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PTF charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $60 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.01% for PTF.
Holdings Overlap
5.8% of IVV's money is in holdings PTF also owns. 40.2% of PTF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 38 in PTF, against full books of 508 and 41.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 504 and 38 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 481 positions PTF does not, 93.5% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in PTF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 4.73% | 3.22% |
| SNDKSandisk Corporation | 0.30% | 4.44% | 4.14% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 0.27% | 4.45% | 4.18% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.18% | 3.07% | 1.89% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 0.28% | 3.87% | 3.59% |
| KLACKla Corp. | 0.38% | 3.68% | 3.30% |
| LRCXLam Resh Corp | 0.58% | 2.95% | 2.37% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc. | 0.20% | 3.26% | 3.06% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.64% | 2.65% | 2.01% |
| TERTeradyne Inc | 0.09% | 3.03% | 2.94% |
40.2% of PTF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PTF?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PTF charges 0.60%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or PTF?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.08% vs +48.79% for PTF, so PTF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +9.53% vs +13.34% for PTF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or PTF?
PTF has been the more volatile fund at 25.1% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PTF -55.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and PTF?
IVV and PTF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PTF?
40.2% of PTF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 40.2% of PTF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 38 in PTF.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PTF?
IVV yields 1.10% while PTF yields 0.01%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PTF better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. PTF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 39.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.