PTF vs VYM
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PTF or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PTF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $540M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.01% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 41 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +30.66%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +36.92%Best | +15.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.82%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.91%Best | +12.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -55.4%Best | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,035Best | $17,861 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 18, 2026 (19.8 years).
PTF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
PTF vs VYM Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PTF returned +36.92% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, PTF is up 30.66% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, PTF compounded at +31.82% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.91% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PTF has the edge at +13.37% annualized vs +6.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PTF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.4% for PTF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTF charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTF currently yields 0.01% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
5.4% of PTF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.5% of VYM's money is in holdings PTF also owns.
PTF and VYM share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in PTF and 557 in VYM, against full books of 41 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 526 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PTF (96.5% of the fund), and 35 for PTF that do not appear in VYM (92.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PTF and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTF or VYM?
PTF has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PTF or VYM?
Over the past year PTF returned +36.92% vs +15.34% for VYM, so PTF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PTF annualized +13.37% vs +6.82% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PTF or VYM?
PTF has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PTF -55.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PTF and VYM?
PTF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PTF and VYM?
5.4% of PTF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.5% of VYM's is in holdings PTF also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in PTF and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTF or VYM?
PTF yields 0.01% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PTF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PTF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.