IVV vs QINT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QINT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.34% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $654M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.48% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 366 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +14.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +24.67% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | +10.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 16.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -33.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | American Century Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 10, 2018 |
IVV vs QINT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is a ETF from American Century Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while QINT returned +24.67%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 14.40% for QINT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.80% per year against +21.80% for QINT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.37% and +10.03% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QINT has the edge at +10.16% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -33.9% for QINT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QINT charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $34 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.48% for QINT.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QINT share 3 holdings out of 839 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QINT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QINT charges 0.34%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QINT?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +24.67% for QINT, so QINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +10.16% for QINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QINT?
QINT has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QINT -33.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and QINT?
IVV and QINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QINT?
IVV and QINT share 3 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 839 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QINT?
IVV yields 1.09% while QINT yields 2.48%, so QINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.