IVV vs QINT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs American Century Quality Diversified International ETF
Which is better, IVV or QINT?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y and the full window, QINT over 1Y and 3Y. QINT is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QINT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.34% |
| AUM | $886.7B | $745M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.44% |
| Holdings | 508 | 381 |
| YTD Return | +12.70% | +13.08%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.36% | +21.83%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.16% | +21.69%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.75%Best | +9.58% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 16.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Tie | -33.9%Tie |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,221Best | $15,800 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 11.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | American Century Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 10, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2018 to Sep 8, 2026 (8 years).
IVV vs QINT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QINT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is an ETF from American Century Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% while QINT returned +21.83%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.70% versus a gain of 13.08% for QINT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +21.69% for QINT; over five years the annualized figures are +12.75% and +9.58% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +14.02% annualized vs +9.90%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.6% for QINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -33.9% for QINT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QINT charges 0.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $34 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.44% for QINT.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of IVV's money is in holdings QINT also owns. 0.6% of QINT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
3 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 346 in QINT, against full books of 508 and 381.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 4 positions for QINT that do not appear in our book for IVV (0.7% of the fund), and 491 for IVV that do not appear in QINT (99.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and QINT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QINT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QINT charges 0.34%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QINT?
Over the past year IVV returned +19.36% vs +21.83% for QINT, so QINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +14.02% vs +9.90% for QINT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QINT?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.6% for QINT. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs QINT -33.9%.
Should I hold both IVV and QINT?
IVV and QINT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QINT?
IVV yields 1.10% while QINT yields 2.44%, so QINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QINT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 5Y and the full window, QINT over 1Y and 3Y. QINT is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.