QINT vs VXUS
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, QINT or VXUS?
Nearly the same fund. VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QINT led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QINT | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $745M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 2.59% |
| Holdings | 381 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +14.35% | +16.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.08% | +27.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10%Best | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63%Best | +9.09% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 16.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,836Best | $15,450 |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (8 years).
QINT vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
QINT vs VXUS Performance
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QINT returned +25.08% while VXUS returned +27.58%. Year to date, QINT is up 14.35% versus a gain of 16.15% for VXUS.
Over three years, QINT compounded at +22.10% per year against +20.48% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.63% and +9.09% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QINT has the edge at +10.07% annualized vs +8.91%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 16.2% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for QINT and -35.1% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QINT charges 0.34% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $5 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QINT currently yields 2.44% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 68.0% of QINT's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.5% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, QINT as of Aug 17, 2026 and VXUS as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
246 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in QINT and 8,092 in VXUS, against full books of 381 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QINT | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 1.42% | 1.70% | 0.28% |
| BBVA:MABanco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. Reg Shs | 1.47% | 0.31% | 1.16% |
| LVMH:PALvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton Se | 1.39% | 0.30% | 1.09% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 0.91% | 0.72% | 0.19% |
| LLOY:LNLloyds Banking Group Plc | 1.18% | 0.19% | 0.99% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.70% | 0.65% | 0.05% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 0.91% | 0.30% | 0.61% |
| INGA:ASIng Groep Nv | 0.99% | 0.20% | 0.79% |
| NWG:LNNatWest Group PLC | 1.01% | 0.16% | 0.85% |
| RIO:LNRio Tinto Plc | 0.90% | 0.22% | 0.68% |
68.0% of QINT is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QINT or VXUS?
QINT has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QINT or VXUS?
Over the past year QINT returned +25.08% vs +27.58% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QINT annualized +10.07% vs +8.91% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QINT or VXUS?
QINT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 16.2% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QINT -33.9% vs VXUS -35.1%.
Should I hold both QINT and VXUS?
QINT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QINT and VXUS?
At least 68.0% of QINT's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 246 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in QINT and 8,092 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, QINT or VXUS?
QINT yields 2.44% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than QINT?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. QINT led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VXUS over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.