QINT vs VYM
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QINT or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QINT led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. QINT is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QINT | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $745M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.44% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 381 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.35% | +14.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +25.08%Best | +20.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.10%Best | +18.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.63% | +12.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,836 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 11.9%Best | 25.9% |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 12, 2018 to Sep 4, 2026 (8 years).
QINT vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
QINT vs VYM Performance
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is an ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QINT returned +25.08% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, QINT is up 14.35% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, QINT compounded at +22.10% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.63% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.38% annualized vs +10.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.5% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for QINT and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QINT charges 0.34% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $4 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QINT currently yields 2.44% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.1% of QINT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's money is in holdings QINT also owns.
QINT and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, QINT as of Aug 17, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in QINT and 602 in VYM, against full books of 381 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 567 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QINT (96.9% of the fund), and 4 for QINT that do not appear in VYM (0.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QINT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QINT or VYM?
QINT has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QINT or VYM?
Over the past year QINT returned +25.08% vs +20.84% for VYM, so QINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QINT annualized +10.07% vs +10.38% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QINT or VYM?
QINT has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.5% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QINT -33.9% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both QINT and VYM?
QINT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QINT and VYM?
1.1% of QINT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's is in holdings QINT also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 346 positions we hold weights for in QINT and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QINT or VYM?
QINT yields 2.44% while VYM yields 2.24%, so QINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QINT?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QINT led over 1Y and 3Y, VYM over 5Y and the full window. QINT is less concentrated, with 11.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 25.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.