QINT vs VYM
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QINT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QINT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $654M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.48% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 366 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.40% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.67% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.03% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | American Century Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 10, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QINT vs VYM Performance
American Century Quality Diversified International ETF (QINT) is a ETF from American Century Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QINT returned +24.67% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, QINT is up 14.40% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, QINT compounded at +21.80% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.03% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QINT has the edge at +10.16% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QINT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for QINT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QINT charges 0.34% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $4 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QINT currently yields 2.48% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QINT and VYM share 1 holdings out of 894 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QINT | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI | 0.22% | 0.25% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QINT or VYM?
QINT has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QINT or VYM?
Over the past year QINT returned +24.67% vs +24.43% for VYM, so QINT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QINT annualized +10.16% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QINT or VYM?
QINT has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QINT -33.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QINT and VYM?
QINT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QINT and VYM?
QINT and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QINT or VYM?
QINT yields 2.48% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.