IVV vs QQJG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QQJG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $7M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.69% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 84 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | -11.31% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +3.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +10.04% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 19.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -36.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 27, 2021 |
IVV vs QQJG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QQJG returned +3.29%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a loss of 11.31% for QQJG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +10.04% for QQJG. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -36.8% for QQJG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QQJG charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.69% for QQJG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QQJG share 35 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QQJG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQJG charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QQJG?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +3.29% for QQJG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +0.79% for QQJG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QQJG?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QQJG -36.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and QQJG?
IVV and QQJG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QQJG?
IVV and QQJG share 35 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QQJG?
IVV yields 1.10% while QQJG yields 0.69%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.