QQJG vs VXUS
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQJG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $7M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -11.31% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.29% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QQJG vs VXUS Performance
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, QQJG is down 11.31% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, QQJG compounded at +10.04% per year against +19.53% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for QQJG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQJG charges 0.20% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $5 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQJG currently yields 0.69% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QQJG and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 7945 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQJG or VXUS?
QQJG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQJG or VXUS?
Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQJG annualized +0.79% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQJG or VXUS?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QQJG -36.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QQJG and VXUS?
QQJG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQJG and VXUS?
QQJG and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7945 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQJG or VXUS?
QQJG yields 0.69% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.