QQJG vs VYM
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 568 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQJG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $7M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 84 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -11.31% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.29% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.04% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
QQJG vs VYM Performance
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQJG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, QQJG is down 11.31% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, QQJG compounded at +10.04% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.11% annualized vs +0.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for QQJG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQJG charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQJG currently yields 0.69% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
QQJG and VYM share 10 holdings out of 637 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQJG or VYM?
QQJG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQJG or VYM?
Over the past year QQJG returned +3.29% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QQJG annualized +0.79% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQJG or VYM?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQJG -36.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both QQJG and VYM?
QQJG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQJG and VYM?
QQJG and VYM share 10 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 637 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQJG or VYM?
QQJG yields 0.69% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.