IVV vs QTUM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Quantum ETF
Which is better, IVV or QTUM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QTUM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QTUM is less concentrated, with 16.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.80% |
| Holdings | 508 | 179 |
| YTD Return | +12.51% | +31.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +50.35%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | +45.00%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | +24.27%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9%Best | 26.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -33.9%Best | -38.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,384 | $29,637Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 16.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 4, 2018 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 5, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (8 years).
IVV vs QTUM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QTUM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while QTUM returned +50.35%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 31.65% for QTUM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +45.00% for QTUM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +24.27% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QTUM has the edge at +25.76% annualized vs +13.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTUM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.1% compared with 16.9% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.9% for IVV and -38.5% for QTUM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QTUM charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.80% for QTUM.
Holdings Overlap
33.5% of IVV's money is in holdings QTUM also owns. 35.3% of QTUM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
32 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 86 in QTUM, against full books of 508 and 179.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for QTUM that do not appear in our book for IVV (27.1% of the fund), and 463 for IVV that do not appear in QTUM (65.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QTUM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.98% | 1.30% | 6.68% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.44% | 1.51% | 3.93% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.01% | 1.29% | 2.72% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.19% | 1.13% | 2.06% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.98% | 1.18% | 1.80% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.51% | 1.27% | 0.24% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.18% | 1.23% | 0.05% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.55% | 1.69% | 1.14% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 0.45% | 1.39% | 0.94% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.72% | 1.10% | 0.38% |
35.3% of QTUM is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QTUM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QTUM charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QTUM?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +50.35% for QTUM, so QTUM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +13.94% vs +25.76% for QTUM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QTUM?
QTUM has been the more volatile fund at 26.1% annualized versus 16.9% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -33.9% vs QTUM -38.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QTUM?
IVV and QTUM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QTUM?
35.3% of QTUM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 35.3% of QTUM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 86 in QTUM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QTUM?
IVV yields 1.06% while QTUM yields 0.80%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTUM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QTUM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QTUM is less concentrated, with 16.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.