IVV vs QTUM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Defiance Quantum ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QTUM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QTUM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $5.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.83% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 87 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +34.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +65.91% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | +47.00% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | +25.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 26.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -38.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Defiance ETFs, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 4, 2018 |
IVV vs QTUM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) is a ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while QTUM returned +65.91%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 34.39% for QTUM.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.08% per year against +47.00% for QTUM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.96% and +25.96% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QTUM has the edge at +26.29% annualized vs +7.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTUM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -38.5% for QTUM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QTUM charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.83% for QTUM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and QTUM share 31 holdings out of 561 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QTUM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QTUM charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or QTUM?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +65.91% for QTUM, so QTUM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +26.29% for QTUM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or QTUM?
QTUM has been the more volatile fund at 26.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs QTUM -38.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and QTUM?
IVV and QTUM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QTUM?
IVV and QTUM share 31 common holdings with a 15.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 561 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QTUM?
IVV yields 1.10% while QTUM yields 0.83%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.