IVV vs RPV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or RPV?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, RPV over 1Y. RPV is less concentrated, with 20.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RPV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $1.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 508 | 126 |
| YTD Return | +11.57% | +17.36%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +27.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +19.53% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80%Best | +12.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.2%Best | 22.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -76.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,262Best | $18,028 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 20.2%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Mar 1, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2006 to Sep 10, 2026 (20.5 years).
IVV vs RPV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RPV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF (RPV) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while RPV returned +27.70%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 17.36% for RPV.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +19.53% for RPV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.80% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 21-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.49% annualized vs +7.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -76.8% for RPV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RPV charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.24% for RPV.
Holdings Overlap
10.4% of IVV's money is in holdings RPV also owns. 96.5% of RPV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
Most of RPV is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
117 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 120 in RPV, against full books of 508 and 126.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 2 positions for RPV that do not appear in our book for IVV (2.0% of the fund), and 380 for IVV that do not appear in RPV (89.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RPV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNCCentene Corp. | 0.05% | 2.58% | 2.53% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 0.06% | 2.18% | 2.12% |
| CVSCvs Health Corp. | 0.19% | 2.04% | 1.85% |
| HUMHumana Inc. | 0.07% | 2.13% | 2.06% |
| BGBunge Global Sa Common Shares | 0.02% | 2.08% | 2.06% |
| FFord Motor Co. | 0.08% | 1.94% | 1.86% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co. | 0.12% | 1.85% | 1.73% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co. | 0.11% | 1.79% | 1.68% |
| DOWDow Inc. | 0.03% | 1.87% | 1.84% |
| TGTTarget Corp. | 0.10% | 1.78% | 1.68% |
96.5% of RPV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RPV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RPV charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RPV?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +27.70% for RPV, so RPV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (21 years), IVV annualized +9.49% vs +7.80% for RPV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RPV?
RPV has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs RPV -76.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and RPV?
IVV and RPV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RPV?
96.5% of RPV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 96.5% of RPV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 117 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 120 in RPV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RPV?
IVV yields 1.06% while RPV yields 2.24%, so RPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RPV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, RPV over 1Y. RPV is less concentrated, with 20.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.