IVV vs SAMM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strategas Macro Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SAMM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SAMM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.02% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 35 | |
| YTD Return | +12.71% | +7.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.89% | +23.51% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.08% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.96% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -24.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strategas Asset Management, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 3, 2024 |
IVV vs SAMM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) is a ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% while SAMM returned +23.51%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.71% versus a gain of 7.51% for SAMM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 15.0% for SAMM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -24.6% for SAMM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SAMM charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 1.02% for SAMM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SAMM share 21 holdings out of 518 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SAMM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SAMM charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SAMM?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.89% vs +23.51% for SAMM, so SAMM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.00% vs +13.03% for SAMM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SAMM?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 15.0% for SAMM. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SAMM -24.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SAMM?
IVV and SAMM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SAMM?
IVV and SAMM share 21 common holdings with a 7.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 518 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SAMM?
IVV yields 1.10% while SAMM yields 1.02%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.