IVV vs SAMM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strategas Macro Momentum ETF
Which is better, IVV or SAMM?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SAMM over 1Y. SAMM is less concentrated, with 27.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SAMM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.95% |
| Holdings | 508 | 35 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +12.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +18.68%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 14.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -24.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $15,425Best | $14,115 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 27.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strategas Asset Management, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 3, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 4, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.5 years).
IVV vs SAMM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SAMM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strategas Macro Momentum ETF (SAMM) is an ETF from Strategas Asset Management, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while SAMM returned +18.68%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 12.68% for SAMM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SAMM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.9% compared with 11.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -24.6% for SAMM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SAMM charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.95% for SAMM.
Holdings Overlap
7.8% of IVV's money is in holdings SAMM also owns. 61.2% of SAMM's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
24 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 40 in SAMM, against full books of 508 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 14 positions for SAMM that do not appear in our book for IVV (34.2% of the fund), and 458 for IVV that do not appear in SAMM (90.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SAMM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 2.47% | 1.31% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.35% | 3.14% | 2.79% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.47% | 2.81% | 2.34% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 0.67% | 2.55% | 1.88% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 0.57% | 2.42% | 1.85% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.35% | 2.63% | 2.28% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 0.16% | 2.80% | 2.64% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 0.55% | 2.40% | 1.85% |
| LITELumentum Holdings Inc | 0.11% | 2.67% | 2.56% |
61.2% of SAMM is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SAMM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SAMM charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SAMM?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +18.68% for SAMM, so SAMM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SAMM?
SAMM has been the more volatile fund at 14.9% annualized versus 11.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SAMM -24.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and SAMM?
IVV and SAMM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SAMM?
61.2% of SAMM's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 61.2% of SAMM's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 40 in SAMM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SAMM?
IVV yields 1.06% while SAMM yields 0.95%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SAMM better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SAMM over 1Y. SAMM is less concentrated, with 27.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.