IVV vs SMOT
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
Which is better, IVV or SMOT?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SMOT is less concentrated, with 15.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMOT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $339M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.21% |
| Holdings | 508 | 111 |
| YTD Return | +11.57%Best | +7.22% |
| 1Y Return | +17.57%Best | +7.90% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.71%Best | +10.65% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.80% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 17.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -23.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $21,283Best | $15,466 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 15.4%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 4, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 6, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (3.9 years).
IVV vs SMOT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SMOT Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while SMOT returned +7.90%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.57% versus a gain of 7.22% for SMOT.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.71% per year against +10.65% for SMOT. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +21.37% annualized vs +11.83%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -23.4% for SMOT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMOT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 1.21% for SMOT.
Holdings Overlap
3.7% of IVV's money is in holdings SMOT also owns. 67.0% of SMOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
73 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 110 in SMOT, against full books of 508 and 111.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 35 positions for SMOT that do not appear in our book for IVV (29.9% of the fund), and 422 for IVV that do not appear in SMOT (95.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SMOT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQVIqvia Holdings Inc. | 0.06% | 1.78% | 1.72% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 0.10% | 1.68% | 1.58% |
| TECHBio-Techne Corp | 0.02% | 1.66% | 1.64% |
| BDXBecton Dickinson And Co. | 0.07% | 1.48% | 1.41% |
| CTVACorteva Inc. | 0.08% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
| SQBlock, Inc | 0.07% | 1.42% | 1.35% |
| BIIBBiogen Inc. | 0.05% | 1.42% | 1.37% |
| AMCRAmcor Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.03% | 1.43% | 1.40% |
| ELEstee Lauder Cos., Inc. | 0.03% | 1.40% | 1.37% |
| DVNDevon Energy Corp. | 0.07% | 1.35% | 1.28% |
67.0% of SMOT is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMOT?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMOT charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SMOT?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +7.90% for SMOT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +21.37% vs +11.83% for SMOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SMOT?
SMOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SMOT -23.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and SMOT?
IVV and SMOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMOT?
67.0% of SMOT's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 67.0% of SMOT's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 110 in SMOT.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMOT?
IVV yields 1.06% while SMOT yields 1.21%, so SMOT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMOT better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. SMOT is less concentrated, with 15.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.