IVV vs SRHQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SRH US Quality GARP ETF
Which is better, IVV or SRHQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SRHQ over 1Y. SRHQ is less concentrated, with 18.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $219M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 508 | 82 |
| YTD Return | +12.51% | +22.36%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.57% | +23.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27%Best | +19.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0%Best | 13.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -18.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $21,228Best | $19,374 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 18.9%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SRH Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 4, 2022 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 5, 2022 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.9 years).
IVV vs SRHQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SRHQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SRH US Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) is an ETF from SRH Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% while SRHQ returned +23.92%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 22.36% for SRHQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.27% per year against +19.30% for SRHQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +21.29% annualized vs +18.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRHQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 13.0% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -18.5% for SRHQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRHQ charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.69% for SRHQ.
Holdings Overlap
3.5% of IVV's money is in holdings SRHQ also owns. 48.3% of SRHQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
38 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 81 in SRHQ, against full books of 508 and 82.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 505 and 81 positions we hold weights for.
IVV holds 457 positions SRHQ does not, 95.8% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.98%, AAPL 6.86%, MSFT 5.44%, AMZN 4.01%, GOOGL 3.19%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SRHQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HUMHumana Inc. | 0.07% | 2.45% | 2.38% |
| CNCCentene Corp. | 0.05% | 2.18% | 2.13% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Inc. | 0.56% | 1.57% | 1.01% |
| NLOKGen Digital Inc | 0.02% | 1.73% | 1.71% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 0.05% | 1.64% | 1.59% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.33% | 1.33% | 1.00% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 0.16% | 1.47% | 1.31% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 0.13% | 1.47% | 1.34% |
| CPAYCorpay Inc | 0.04% | 1.52% | 1.48% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 0.45% | 1.10% | 0.65% |
48.3% of SRHQ is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRHQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRHQ charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SRHQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.57% vs +23.92% for SRHQ, so SRHQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +21.29% vs +18.48% for SRHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRHQ?
SRHQ has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 13.0% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SRHQ -18.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and SRHQ?
IVV and SRHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRHQ?
48.3% of SRHQ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 48.3% of SRHQ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 38 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 81 in SRHQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRHQ?
IVV yields 1.06% while SRHQ yields 0.69%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SRHQ better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 3Y and the full window, SRHQ over 1Y. SRHQ is less concentrated, with 18.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.