IVV vs SRHQ
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs SRH US Quality GARP ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SRHQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SRHQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $224M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.69% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 80 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +26.62% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +33.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +19.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -18.5% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | SRH Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 4, 2022 |
IVV vs SRHQ Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and SRH US Quality GARP ETF (SRHQ) is a ETF from SRH Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while SRHQ returned +33.05%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 26.62% for SRHQ.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +19.97% for SRHQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, SRHQ has the edge at +19.94% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.5% for SRHQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -18.5% for SRHQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SRHQ charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.69% for SRHQ.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SRHQ share 38 holdings out of 548 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SRHQ?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SRHQ charges 0.35%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SRHQ?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +33.05% for SRHQ, so SRHQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +19.94% for SRHQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SRHQ?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.5% for SRHQ. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SRHQ -18.5%.
Should I hold both IVV and SRHQ?
IVV and SRHQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SRHQ?
IVV and SRHQ share 38 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 548 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SRHQ?
IVV yields 1.10% while SRHQ yields 0.69%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.