IVV vs SSUS
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SSUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SSUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.77% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $561M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.47% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 24 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +15.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.64% | +22.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | +17.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +11.08% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Day Hagan Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 16, 2020 |
IVV vs SSUS Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF (SSUS) is a ETF from Day Hagan Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% while SSUS returned +22.99%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.72% versus a gain of 15.97% for SSUS.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.55% per year against +17.53% for SSUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +11.08% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SSUS has the edge at +13.92% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.9% for SSUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.8% for SSUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SSUS charges 0.77%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $77 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.47% for SSUS.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SSUS share 5 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SSUS?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SSUS charges 0.77%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SSUS?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.64% vs +22.99% for SSUS, so SSUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +13.92% for SSUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SSUS?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.9% for SSUS. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SSUS -23.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and SSUS?
IVV and SSUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SSUS?
IVV and SSUS share 5 common holdings with a 10.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SSUS?
IVV yields 1.09% while SSUS yields 0.47%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.