IVV vs TEKY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF
Which is better, IVV or TEKY?
TEKY has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TEKY led over 1Y and the full window. TEKY is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TEKY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $876.4B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.17% |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +18.19%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +16.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2%Best | 27.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -21.4% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $15,159 | $17,493Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 37.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Lazard Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 4, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.4 years).
IVV vs TEKY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
IVV vs TEKY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY) is an ETF from Lazard Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while TEKY returned +16.77%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 18.19% for TEKY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TEKY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.6% compared with 12.2% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -21.4% for TEKY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TEKY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.17% for TEKY.
Holdings Overlap
28.8% of IVV's money is in holdings TEKY also owns. 52.2% of TEKY's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 46 in TEKY, against full books of 508 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for TEKY that do not appear in our book for IVV (12.3% of the fund), and 463 for IVV that do not appear in TEKY (69.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in TEKY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 5.72% | 2.35% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 5.24% | 2.24% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 4.25% | 0.41% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 1.87% | 3.82% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 3.48% | 0.83% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 3.14% | 1.98% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 0.65% | 2.95% | 2.30% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 0.35% | 3.23% | 2.88% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.47% | 2.65% | 2.18% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 0.12% | 2.77% | 2.65% |
52.2% of TEKY is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TEKY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TEKY charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or TEKY?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +16.77% for TEKY, so TEKY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +34.60% vs +49.10% for TEKY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or TEKY?
TEKY has been the more volatile fund at 27.6% annualized versus 12.2% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -8.9% vs TEKY -21.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and TEKY?
IVV and TEKY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TEKY?
52.2% of TEKY's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 52.2% of TEKY's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 46 in TEKY.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TEKY?
IVV yields 1.06% while TEKY yields 0.17%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TEKY better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TEKY led over 1Y and the full window. TEKY is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.