IVV vs TEKY
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. TEKY delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TEKY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.16% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 51 | |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +23.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | +31.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.37% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 28.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -21.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Lazard Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 4, 2025 |
IVV vs TEKY Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF (TEKY) is a ETF from Lazard Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% while TEKY returned +31.52%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.50% versus a gain of 23.56% for TEKY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TEKY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.4% for TEKY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TEKY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.16% for TEKY.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TEKY share 22 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 25.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TEKY?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TEKY charges 0.50%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TEKY?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.02% vs +31.52% for TEKY, so TEKY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.07% vs +58.65% for TEKY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TEKY?
TEKY has been the more volatile fund at 28.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TEKY -21.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and TEKY?
IVV and TEKY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TEKY?
IVV and TEKY share 22 common holdings with a 25.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TEKY?
IVV yields 1.09% while TEKY yields 0.16%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.