IVV vs TFGZ

IVV vs TFGZ

Which is better, IVV or TFGZ?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns (1Y): IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTFGZ
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.79%
AUM$876.4B$7M
Dividend Yield1.06%0.00%
Holdings50844
YTD Return+12.51%+15.17%Best
1Y Return+17.57%-
3Y Return (annualized)+21.27%-
5Y Return (annualized)+12.95%-
Top 10 Weight37.9%Best47.9%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Thornburg Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMay 15, 2000Apr 1, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs TFGZ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs TFGZ Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Thornburg Focus Growth Fund ETF (TFGZ) is an ETF from Thornburg Investment Management. Year to date, IVV is up 12.51% versus a gain of 15.17% for TFGZ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TFGZ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for TFGZ.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in TFGZ17.1%
TFGZ already in IVV45.2%

17.1% of IVV's money is in holdings TFGZ also owns. 45.2% of TFGZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in TFGZ, against full books of 508 and 44.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 23 positions for TFGZ that do not appear in our book for IVV (43.6% of the fund), and 482 for IVV that do not appear in TFGZ (82.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TFGZDifference
GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.0013.19%11.09%7.90%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 375.44%7.61%2.17%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.98%5.71%2.73%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.1.94%3.02%1.08%
MAMastercard Inc0.69%3.20%2.51%
LRCXLam Research Corp0.58%3.23%2.65%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.51%1.48%0.03%
VRTVertiv Group Corp0.16%2.53%2.37%
SPGIS&p Global Inc0.19%2.47%2.28%
DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A0.14%2.31%2.17%

45.2% of TFGZ is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVTFGZ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TFGZ?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TFGZ charges 0.79%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TFGZ?

45.2% of TFGZ's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 45.2% of TFGZ's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 13 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 43 in TFGZ.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TFGZ?

IVV yields 1.06% while TFGZ yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TFGZ better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.