IVV vs UCC

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVUCCWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.95%
AUM$865.2B$10M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.24%
Holdings50852
YTD Return+13.80%-2.64%
1Y Return+23.70%+6.24%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+13.53%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+0.04%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%36.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-83.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityAlternative
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 30, 2007

IVV vs UCC Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares Ultra Consumer Discretionary (UCC) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while UCC returned +6.24%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a loss of 2.64% for UCC.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +13.53% for UCC; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +0.04% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, UCC has the edge at +13.22% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 36.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -83.3% for UCC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while UCC charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.24% for UCC.

Holdings Overlap

9.0%overlap

IVV and UCC share 45 holdings out of 507 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in UCCDifference
AMZN3.75%15.20%11.45%
TSLA1.65%13.09%11.44%
HD0.51%3.87%3.36%
MCDProProPro
TJXProProPro
BKNGProProPro
LOWProProPro
SBUXProProPro
MARProProPro
HLTProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with UCC
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or UCC?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UCC charges 0.95%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or UCC?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +6.24% for UCC, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +13.22% for UCC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or UCC?

UCC has been the more volatile fund at 36.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UCC -83.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and UCC?

IVV and UCC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UCC?

IVV and UCC share 45 common holdings with a 9.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 507 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UCC?

IVV yields 1.09% while UCC yields 1.24%, so UCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →