IVV vs VAMO
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Cambria Value and Momentum ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VAMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.65% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $87M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.61% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 103 | |
| YTD Return | +14.29% | +7.95% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +18.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +12.84% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +11.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -41.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Cambria Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 8, 2015 |
IVV vs VAMO Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% while VAMO returned +18.48%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.29% versus a gain of 7.95% for VAMO.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +22.19% per year against +12.84% for VAMO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +11.20% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +4.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.0% for VAMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -41.8% for VAMO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VAMO charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.61% for VAMO.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and VAMO share 18 holdings out of 588 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VAMO?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VAMO charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VAMO?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.79% vs +18.48% for VAMO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.06% vs +4.73% for VAMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VAMO?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.0% for VAMO. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VAMO -41.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and VAMO?
IVV and VAMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VAMO?
IVV and VAMO share 18 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 588 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VAMO?
IVV yields 1.10% while VAMO yields 0.61%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.